Croatia's president faces conservative rival in election run-offKohli’s dismissal unfolded in dramatic fashion. Facing Mitchell Starc just before the lunch break, Kohli attempted to drive a full-length delivery pitched outside the off-stump. The iconic Melbourne Cricket Ground witnessed another emotional rollercoaster during the Boxing Day Test as Virat Kohli once again fell prey to the outside-off trap. While his dismissal sparked discussions among fans and pundits, it was Anushka Sharma's reaction in the stands that truly caught everyone's attention. The actress, a constant presence at Kohli’s games, showcased a range of emotions that resonated with millions watching worldwide. Edged and caught behind the wicket, all of Virat Kohli's dismissals this series have had a common theme #AUSvIND pic.twitter.com/5mz5SGcAbh The Dismissal That Sparked a Reaction Kohli’s dismissal unfolded in dramatic fashion. Facing Mitchell Starc just before the lunch break, Kohli attempted to drive a full-length delivery pitched outside the off-stump. The shot, while aesthetically pleasing, resulted in a faint edge that carried to Usman Khawaja at first slip. As Kohli walked back to the pavilion for just five runs, cameras immediately panned to Anushka Sharma, who was visibly disheartened by the turn of events. Anushka, known for her poised demeanor, was seen initially clapping in encouragement but soon turned pensive as Kohli’s wicket flashed on the giant screen. Her subtle but poignant reaction reflected the disappointment of countless fans who had pinned their hopes on the Indian talisman. Anushka Sharma: A Pillar of Support Over the years, Anushka Sharma has been an unwavering source of support for Virat Kohli, both on and off the field. Her presence in the stands often serves as a reminder of the human side of cricket’s biggest stars. During the Boxing Day Test, her reaction encapsulated the collective heartbreak of a nation rooting for Kohli to overcome his recent struggles. Social media was abuzz with clips of Anushka’s expressions, with fans lauding her for always standing by her husband through his highs and lows. Many drew parallels to past moments when she celebrated Kohli’s centuries with unrestrained joy or consoled him during tough times. The Emotional Toll of Cricket Cricket, often dubbed a religion in India, places immense pressure not just on the players but also on their families. For Anushka, this was another instance of navigating the emotional highs and lows that come with being married to one of the world’s most scrutinized athletes. Experts weighed in on the situation, noting how players like Kohli, despite their stature, are vulnerable to public and personal pressures. “Anushka’s reaction speaks volumes about the emotional stakes involved,” former cricketer Michael Clarke remarked during the broadcast. “It’s a reminder that behind every star is a family living every moment of the game.” Social Media Reacts to the Viral Moment The internet, quick to spot such moments, erupted with reactions to Anushka’s expressions. Memes, heartfelt posts, and messages of solidarity flooded platforms like Twitter and Instagram. “Anushka Sharma clapping for Kohli even when he’s struggling is the energy we all need in life,” one fan tweeted. Another wrote, “Behind every great cricketer is a partner who feels every ball, every shot, every dismissal.” The moment also sparked debates about the added scrutiny on cricketers’ families. Many urged fans to show empathy, acknowledging the emotional toll that constant public attention brings. Kohli’s Struggles Continue Kohli’s dismissal wasn’t just another wicket; it symbolized his ongoing battle with the fifth-stump line. While he showcased discipline earlier in the innings, the lapse highlighted his vulnerability against Australia’s relentless bowling attack. For Anushka, the disappointment of the moment was palpable. Yet, her unwavering presence serves as a reminder of the resilience required to endure such challenges. Kohli, no stranger to adversity, will undoubtedly draw strength from the support of his loved ones as he looks to bounce back in the series. Stay informed on all the latest news , real-time breaking news updates, and follow all the important headlines in india news and world News on Zee News.
By Nate Raymond (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Democrats and Republicans clinched a late-night deal on Wednesday that clears the way for votes on a group of President Joe Biden's nominees for federal trial courts in exchange for not pushing forward with four nominees to serve on appellate courts, leaving vacancies that Republican President-elect Donald Trump can fill. The deal, described by a spokesperson for Democratic Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Thursday, was reached after Senate Republicans launched a campaign to try to stall and prevent Democrats from fulfilling their plan to confirm as many life-tenured judges as possible before Trump takes office in January. Senate Republicans had previously said they had votes to block at least two of the four appellate court nominees, including Adeel Mangi, who would have become the first Muslim federal appellate judge if confirmed to the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The deal was sure to disappoint progressive advocates who have been pushing Democrats to fill as many judicial vacancies as possible following the Nov. 5 election, which handed the White House to Trump and control of the Senate to Republicans. "Willingly gifting Donald Trump the chance to appoint judges more committed to political agendas than the rule of law is doing a dangerous disservice to the American people," Maggie Jo Buchanan, the director of the progressive legal group Demand Justice, said in a statement. Since the election, the Senate has confirmed eight of Biden's judge picks, bringing the total number of confirmed judicial nominees to 221. The Democratic-led Senate on Thursday confirmed one more, Sharad Desai, to serve as a trial court judge in Arizona. Republicans at Trump's urging had tried to put procedural roadblocks in place to slow down the process and peel away votes in a Senate that Democrats narrowly control 51-49. But several Republican senators have missed votes to confirm judges. Under the deal, the Senate will vote on confirming seven nominees to district court judges who Schumer had already teed up when it returns from its post-Thanksgiving recess in exchange for no longer pursuing the confirmation of the four nominees to higher-level appellate courts. The Senate will also take up consideration of five other district court nominees who whose nominations were advanced on Thursday by the Senate Judiciary Committee. "The trade was four circuit nominees -- all lacking the votes to get confirmed -- for more than triple the number of additional judges moving forward," a Schumer spokesperson said in a statement. The other appellate nominees were Ryan Park, up for a seat on the Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; Julia Lipez, who was nominated to the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; and Karla Campbell, who was nominated to the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. (Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Deepa Babington)
Rajasthan Royals Squad for IPL 2025: Akash Madhwal Sold to RR for INR 1.2 Crore at Indian Premier League AuctionNone
NoneOctopus Energy tells customers they can slash bills by £300
Dear Editor, Re: Burnaby to chop down 166 trees for community centre redevelopment (Nov. 1, 2024) I appreciated your coverage of the plan to cut 166 trees for the Cameron Community Centre and Library redevelopment. But this isn’t just about one person's feelings about losing trees—it’s about the ripple effects on our community and environment, impacts that extend far beyond what meets the eye. While the City plans to replant 779 trees, let’s be clear: this isn’t a goodwill gesture. It’s a legal requirement under Burnaby’s Tree Bylaw , which mandates replacement trees based on the size of those removed: one for smaller trees, two for mid-sized, and three for the largest. The real questions are: Where will these trees be replanted? And why wait years to start replanting when the loss of mature trees has immediate consequences? Since at least 50% of Cameron Park, where these 166 trees are being cut, is fenced off for redevelopment, there won’t be space to plant 779 trees there. Replanting should begin immediately in nearby areas with low tree canopy. Why delay? Images contributed by Swati Jain. Removing these 166 trees means displacing thousands of living beings that depend on them. Mature trees are ecosystems in themselves, supporting an estimated: 83,000–166,000 insects, 1,660 birds, 330–500 small mammals, and countless microorganisms essential to healthy soil. These numbers aren’t just statistical estimates—they represent the vibrant biodiversity that keeps our environment thriving. And what about the people? Green spaces like this park are vital for mental health, stress relief, and community connection. Losing this park means more noise pollution, fewer opportunities for outdoor recreation under the open sky, and the loss of a beloved social hub with no restrictions on access. For families already stretched by financial stress, this park offered something rare in our city—beauty, peace, and accessibility, all for free. This also highlights a larger issue: tree equity. Wealthier neighborhoods typically enjoy more tree cover and biodiversity , while areas with affordable housing are often left with less. This redevelopment risks widening that gap. Recognizing the dangers posed by climate change, Burnaby city council declared a climate emergency in 2019 . We need more than shiny new buildings—we need urban green spaces that make life livable. Whenever there’s a development at the cost of the natural environment, the environmental impact should be shared alongside the flashy details of the project. I urge the city to involve residents in deciding where and how to replant these trees and to start replanting now, not years from now. This proactive approach would also help Burnaby achieve its greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target of 45% by 2030 . I also urge the people of Burnaby to reach out to Burnaby city council to express their concerns about the loss of green spaces and biodiversity—and to actively participate in shaping where these trees should be replanted. This isn’t about stopping progress; it’s about ensuring progress is sustainable and equitable for all. Sincerely, Swati Jain, BurnabyBy GABRIELA SÁ PESSOA and MAURICIO SAVARESE, Associated Press SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil’s federal police said Thursday they indicted former President Jair Bolsonaro and 36 other people for allegedly attempting a coup to keep him in office after his defeat in the 2022 elections. Police said their findings were being delivered Thursday to Brazil’s Supreme Court, which must decide whether to refer them to Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet, who will either formally charge Bolsonaro and put him on trial, or toss the investigation. The former right-wing president has denied all claims he tried to stay in office after his narrow electoral defeat in 2022 to his rival, leftist President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro has faced a series of legal threats since then. Police said in a brief statement that the Supreme Court had agreed to reveal the names of all 37 people who were indicted “to avoid the dissemination of incorrect news.” The 700-page police document likely will take several days for the court to review, Supreme Court justice Alexandre de Moraes said. Dozens of former and current Bolsonaro aides also were indicted, including Gen. Walter Braga Netto, who was his running mate in the 2022 campaign; former Army commander Gen. Paulo Sérgio Nogueira de Oliveira; Valdemar Costa Neto, the chairman of Bolsonaro’s Liberal Party; and his veteran former adviser, Gen. Augusto Heleno. The investigation started last year. On Tuesday, four military men and one federal police agent were arrested as part of the same probe . Other investigations focus on Bolosnaro’s potential roles in smuggling diamond jewelry into Brazil without properly declaring them, and in directing a subordinate to falsify his and others’ COVID-19 vaccination statuses. Bolsonaro has denied any involvement in either. Another probe found that he had abused his authority to cast doubt on the country’s voting system, and judges barred him from running again until 2030. The far-reaching investigations have weakened Bolsonaro’s status as a leader of Brazil’s right wing, said Carlos Melo, a political science professor at Insper University in Sao Paulo. “Bolsonaro is already barred from running in the 2026 elections,” Melo told the The Associated Press. “And if he is convicted he could also be jailed by then. To avoid being behind bars, he will have to convince Supreme Court justices that he has nothing to do with a plot that involves dozens of his aids. That’s a very tall order,” Melo said. On Tuesday, the federal police arrested four military and a federal police officer accused of plotting to overthrow the government following the 2022 elections, including alleged plans to kill Lula and other top officials.Is a Career in Network Security Worth It? Pros and ConsHoroscope
